Monthly Archives: April 2010

The Rudin (Hardy-Littlewood) Conjecture, Notes 3: Omissions.

1. The set of squares does not contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. As we have mentioned in the beginning of this discussion, Rudin was originally interested (among other things) in the number of terms the set of squares has in … Continue reading

Posted in math.CA, math.CO, math.NT, Mathematics, open problem, seminar notes, The Rudin (Hardy-Littlewood) Conjecture | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment